Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland and WR D4 is made in Finland.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
2. Nokian WR D4 6.04
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 89%
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 94%
1. Nokian WR D4 88%
2. Nokian WR D4 81%
2. Nokian WR D4 78%
1. Nokian WR D4 90%
2. Nokian WR D4 75%
2. Nokian WR D4 72%
1. Nokian WR D4 76%
2. Nokian WR D4 70%
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
2. Nokian WR D4 76%
2. Nokian WR D4 73%
2. Nokian WR D4 72%
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
1. Nokian WR D4 99%
1. Nokian WR D4 67%
1. Nokian WR D4 79%
2. Nokian WR D4 86%
1. Nokian WR D4 85%
2. Nokian WR D4 82%