Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Kenda Wintergen 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Kenda (0%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Kenda Wintergen 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the Wintergen 2 were tested. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Kenda Wintergen 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R22 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Kenda Wintergen 2 Lowcost
2. Kenda Wintergen 2 27.33
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good2. Kenda Wintergen 2 Conditionally recommended
1. Kenda Wintergen 2 Conditionally recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
1. Kenda Wintergen 2 100%
1. Kenda Wintergen 2 100%
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 29,2 | 24,6 | |||||
Kenda Wintergen 2 | 35,3 | - | |||||
Show test details |