18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Vredestein Wintrac

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%	Vredestein Wintrac /56%

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R13 - R17	R14 - R18	R15 - R16
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premium

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

4. Vredestein Wintrac Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

4. Vredestein Wintrac 38

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

4. Vredestein Wintrac 11x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

4. Vredestein Wintrac 3.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

3. Vredestein Wintrac 17.

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

4. Vredestein Wintrac 8.36

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

3. Vredestein Wintrac 2024

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good

3. Vredestein Wintrac Very good

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Good

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

4. Vredestein Wintrac Sufficient

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

91%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

85%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

82%

Vredestein
Wintrac

62%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

4. Vredestein Wintrac 61%

Snow traction

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

4. Vredestein Wintrac 55%

Snow handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

4. Vredestein Wintrac 73%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 59%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 56%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Wintrac

88%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

87%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

83%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

78%

Dry braking

1. Vredestein Wintrac 88%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 83%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 79%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 92%

2. Vredestein Wintrac 88%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 88%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 74%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

92%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

89%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

87%

Vredestein
Wintrac

81%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 96%

2. Vredestein Wintrac 88%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 87%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 88%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 85%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 89%

4. Vredestein Wintrac 71%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 83%

4. Vredestein Wintrac 69%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 89%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 88%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 C

4. Vredestein Wintrac ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

84%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

79%

Vredestein
Wintrac

74%

Exterior noise

1. Vredestein Wintrac 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 78%

Comfort

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 71%

4. Vredestein Wintrac 61%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

4. Vredestein Wintrac ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

87%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

74%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

70%

Vredestein
Wintrac

68%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Vredestein Wintrac 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 63%

Mileage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 96%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 71%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 67%

4. Vredestein Wintrac 55%

Price/value

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 75%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 76%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 67%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 E

4. Vredestein Wintrac ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Wintrac

86.8%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

84.5%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

81%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

79%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	1	2	2+
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	1-	2	1-	2	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	1-	2+	1
Vredestein Wintrac Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2-	2+	3+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	33,4	28,2
Continental WinterContact TS 870	34,2	27,7
Vredestein Wintrac	33,5	30,3
Show test details

Használtautó.hu Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on ice
Best values in test	13,9	14,8	16,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	15,4	16,4	21,7
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	14,6	15,8	22
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	101,6	299,9	299,9	100	101,1	100,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	100	285,8	299,8	100	87,6	99,8
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	99,3	294,4	297,6	96,2	79,6	98,1
Continental WinterContact TS 870	101,6	299,9	299,9	93,8	101,1	100,7
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,3	2,0	1,8	2,1	2,5	1,0	1,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1,3	2,1	2,1	2,4	2,9	2,5	2,0
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	2,0	2,5	2,1	2,4	3,2	2,0	1,9
Show test details