18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Hankook Ventus Prime 4 /72%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R13 - R23	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

Worst position in test

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

94%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

?

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Snow acceleration

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 94%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Lateral guidance on snow

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 100%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Snow performance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Dry braking

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 79%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry lane changing

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Dry steering response

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

91%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

73%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 76%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 77%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 71%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 59%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 A

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

75%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 75%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 72%

Interior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 73%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 70%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

Price/value

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

?

Ice braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Ice lateral guidance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands