18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R16 - R19	R13 - R19	R15 - R18	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

72.1%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

54%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

82%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

76%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74.4%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

73%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

82%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

72%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

69%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

66%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

56%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

48%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

69%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	1-	2-	2	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2-
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Yokohama W.drive V905	34,7	28,3
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	38,4	-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Yokohama W.drive V905	39,9	26,9
Uniroyal MS plus 77	39,1	25,7
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,5	2,1	3,3	2,4	3,7	2,0	2,1
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: -	3,3	2,5	2,1	2,9	4,0	3,5	2,4
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,3	3,2	2,5	2,6	3,1	2,5	1,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: -	3,7	2,6	2,2	2,5	3,2	2,0	1,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	43,4	28,1
Yokohama W.drive V905	42,6	29,4
Uniroyal MS plus 77	41,7	28,6
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	43,1	28,9
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands