12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R16 - R19	R15 - R18	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91.6%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

72.1%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

54%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

84.2%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

82%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

76%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

73%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.4%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

72%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

90.5%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

82%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.2%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

66%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

56%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

48%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.5%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

69%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	1-	2-	2	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2-
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2+	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Yokohama W.drive V905	34,7	28,3
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	38,4	-
Continental WinterContact TS 860	33,5	27,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Yokohama W.drive V905	39,9	26,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,2	25,6
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,5	2,1	3,3	2,4	3,7	2,0	2,1
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: -	3,3	2,5	2,1	2,9	4,0	3,5	2,4
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: -	3,7	2,6	2,2	2,5	3,2	2,0	1,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	43,4	28,1
Yokohama W.drive V905	42,6	29,4
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	43,1	28,9
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands