12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 /0%	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R13 - R23	R13 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 533

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 359

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

Number of tests

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 4x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 11.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 21.

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 16.75

Year of the last test

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 2020

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

76%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 80%

Wet braking

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Wet circle cornering

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

Wet performance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 81%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 75%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

74%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

71%

Dry braking

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 67%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 64%

Dry handling

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 76%

Dry performance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 69%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

69%

Fuel efficiency

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 86%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 79%

Price/value

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 76%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

Rolling resistance

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 47%

Mileage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 76%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 73%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

71%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

70%

Snow handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 68%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

76%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

74%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Exterior noise

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 80%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

Interior noise

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 67%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72 dB

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

77%

Ice braking

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 78%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 73%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands