Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Vredestein (59%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 and Vredestein Snowtrac 5, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the Snowtrac 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland and Snowtrac 5 is made in Netherlands.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R13 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 12.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: - | 3+ | 2 | 2- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 | 38,9 | 27,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 1 | 1,5 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2,8 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,9 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: - | 2,7 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 2,6 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,4 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 | 44,8 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
