Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Starfire W200 Lowcost
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Starfire W200
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Starfire (0%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 and Starfire W200, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Starfire W200 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the W200 were tested. We also know where Blizzak LM-001 is made - Poland.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Starfire W200
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R14 - R15 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Starfire W200 36.
Worst position in test
2. Starfire W200 36.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Starfire W200 | 42,6 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
