Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Nokian WR D4
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2018 185/65 R15 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the WR D4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (97%) of the Nokian WR D4 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland and WR D4 is made in Finland.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Performance comparison
Averaged from 2 tests
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Nokian WR D4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Nokian WR D4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Nokian WR D4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Nokian WR D4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Nokian WR D4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Nokian WR D4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Nokian WR D4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Nokian WR D4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Nokian WR D4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Nokian WR D4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Nokian WR D4
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
