Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium3. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Nokian WR D4
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.882. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WR D4 Recommended3. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 9 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
9
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | 1- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 32,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 33,3 | 28,7 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 35 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 96,9 | ||||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 97,5 | ||||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 98 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 96,9 | 99,8 | 99 | 100 | 100 | |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 98,4 | 95,6 | 96 | 94,9 | 85,6 | 99,8 | |
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 98,5 | 88,2 | 97 | 98,8 | 88,7 | 98,4 | |
| Nokian WR D4 | 99,7 | 96,9 | 99,5 | 99 | 85,1 | 97,9 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 101 | 100 | 103,3 | 100,3 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | 98,6 | 98,3 | 98,9 | 98,6 | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Very good | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Good | 99,3 | 97,4 | 100,5 | 99,9 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 1- | 2 | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 35,6 | 25,8 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 26,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 412 | 142 | 127 | 143 | 25 | 10 | |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended | 341 | 100 | 114 | 127 | 19 | 8 | |
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Highly recommended | 376 | 128 | 108 | 140 | 18 | 8 | |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Highly recommended | 387 | 124 | 121 | 142 | 21 | 8 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
