In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Matador (40%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 and Matador MP92 Sibir Snow, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the MP92 Sibir Snow were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow has C rating. We also know where Blizzak LM-001 is made - Poland.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Winter
|
2016 | 225/45 R17 | View |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.