Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP51

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Kumho (61%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 and Kumho WinterCraft WP51, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2018 185/65 R15 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 has B wet grip rating, whereas 96% of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 has C rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland and WinterCraft WP51 is made in Korea.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Kumho WinterCraft WP51 /0%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

/0%

Kumho WinterCraft WP51

/0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R14 - R21

R13 - R17

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 66

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 11x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 5.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 31.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 17.09

Year of the last test

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 2019

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Kumho
WinterCraft WP51

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 C

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

84%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP51

81%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Kumho
WinterCraft WP51

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Kumho
WinterCraft WP51

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

74%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 D

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

70%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP51

60%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP51

80.4%

Add to comparison

Mutual tests

ACE Winter tyre test 2018 185/65 R15

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise	Running costs
Best values in test	206	67	68	43	19	8	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended	182	58	53	43	15	6	7
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Recommended	183	60	56	40	13	5	9
Show test details