18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 /81%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ /87%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R14 - R17	R16 - R22	R0 - R21	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Premium

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

5. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 78

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 14x

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 2.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

Worst position in test

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 14.

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 5.5

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 2025

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

Worst rating in test

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

Wet

(Overall rating)

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

84%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Wet handling

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 81%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Wet braking

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 77%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Wet circle cornering

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 81%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 79%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 B

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

82%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

81%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Dry braking

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 74%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 85%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry performance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 59%

5. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

81%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 78%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 65%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 76%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 83%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 80%

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

74%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

73%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

59%

Price/value

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 73%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 49%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 73%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

Mileage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 74%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 37%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 C

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

81%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

75%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

5. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 65%

Interior noise

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

0%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands