12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 /95%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R14 - R22	R14 - R18	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premium

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

Number of tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Wet handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Wet performance

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 81%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 86%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

86%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 72%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry performance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Dry driving behavior

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 100%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 78%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

89%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 62%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

66%

Price/value

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 68%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 75%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Mileage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

92%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

Interior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

Ice braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 -27%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands