Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Fulda (64%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the Kristall Control HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (55%) of the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 also have B wet ratings. We also know where Blizzak LM-001 is made - Poland.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary
2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | 1- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 32,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 35,5 | 28,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||