12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /0%	Kumho WinterCraft WP71 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R13 - R21	R16 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 359

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 57

Number of tests

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 11x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 6.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 28.

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 12.55

Year of the last test

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 2020

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

76%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 82%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 89%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 89%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

Wet braking

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 80%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 72%

Wet circle cornering

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 76%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 C

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

77%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

71%

Dry braking

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 67%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 0%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 76%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 68%

Dry performance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 0%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

75%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

71%

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 74%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 82%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

Snow handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 70%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

69%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

66%

Price/value

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 73%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 62%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 47%

Mileage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 73%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 63%

Fuel efficiency

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 79%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 D

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

76%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Exterior noise

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 76%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

Interior noise

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

77%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

0%

Ice braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 0%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 73%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Sportscars Winter tyre test 2018 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	2	2-	2+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2	2-	2
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands