12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Falken (58%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 and Falken EuroWinter HS01, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Sportscars 2018 245/45 R18 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the EuroWinter HS01 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (75%) of the Falken EuroWinter HS01 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland and EuroWinter HS01 is made in Turkey.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R13 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 359

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

Number of tests

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

Year of the last test

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

76%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

Wet braking

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

Wet performance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 81%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 75%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

71%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 76%

Dry performance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 67%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

71%

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

Snow handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

69%

Price/value

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 47%

Mileage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 73%

Fuel efficiency

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 79%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

Interior noise

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

77%

Ice braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 73%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Sportscars Winter tyre test 2018 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	2	2-	2+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2	2-	2
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands