18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 /95%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ /87%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R16 - R22	R14 - R22	R0 - R21	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premium

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

Worst position in test

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Average position in tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Wet handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 91%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Wet braking

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Wet performance

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 81%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 77%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

Wet circle cornering

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 86%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 81%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

82%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Dry braking

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 72%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry performance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 59%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 76%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 80%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 65%

5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 62%

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

74

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

66

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

59%

Price/value

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 68%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 49%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 75%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

Mileage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 37%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

81%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Interior noise

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands