18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 /95%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R16 - R22	R14 - R22	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premium

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Average position in tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

Wet braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Wet handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

Wet performance

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 81%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 77%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

Wet circle cornering

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

82%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 72%

Dry performance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 59%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

66%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

59%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 75%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Mileage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 37%

Price/value

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 68%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 49%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 65%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 62%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

Interior noise

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Ice braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 -27%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P -27%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands