12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%	Dunlop Winter Sport 5 /86%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R13 - R17	R14 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 189

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

Number of tests

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 48x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

Best position in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 16.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 4.9

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Year of the last test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

77%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

84%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

84%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

77.4%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

89%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

87.5%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

77.1%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

74%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

72%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

80%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

72.3%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

70%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72 dB

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.5%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

76.5%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 9 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ACE Winter tyre test 2018 185/65 R15

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise	Running costs
Best values in test	206	67	68	43	19	8	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended	182	58	53	43	15	6	7
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Test winner	206	66	68	43	16	7	6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	1-	2-	2	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2+	2-
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Continental WinterContact TS 860	33,5	27,5
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	33,6	27,6
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2017 225/45 R17

Name	Points total
Best values in test	100
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	96,9
Continental WinterContact TS 860	100
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	99,3
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	100	96,9	99,8	99	100	100
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	98,4	95,6	96	94,9	85,6	99,8
Continental WinterContact TS 860	100	94,6	99,8	96,2	100	100
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	97,7	93	99,8	93,4	97,6	97,9
Show test details

Autoklub ČR Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	101	100	103,3	100,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	98,6	98,3	98,9	98,6
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Very good	101	99,5	103,3	100,3
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Very good	99,8	98,1	101,6	99,8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: -	1-	2	2+	1
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: -	2+	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,2	25,6
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	36,1	25,5
Show test details

GTÜ Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	412	142	127	143	25	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended	341	100	114	127	19	8
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Highly recommended	412	142	127	143	25	9
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Highly recommended	367	112	119	136	22	8
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands