12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 /95%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R14 - R22	R16 - R22	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

Best position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Average position in tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

89%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 91%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

Wet performance

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 81%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 77%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 86%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

82%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 72%

Dry performance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 59%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

Dry driving behavior

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 100%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 91%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 82%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

66%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

59%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 75%

Mileage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 37%

Price/value

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 68%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 49%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

Snow handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 65%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 62%

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

Interior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 0%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 0%

Ice braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 -27%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P -27%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands