12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ /87%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R14 - R22	R16 - R22	R14 - R18	R0 - R21	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

Worst position in test

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

89%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 81%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

86%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

82%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Dry driving behavior

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 78%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry performance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 59%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

89%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 76%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 80%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 65%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

74%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

59%

Price/value

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 49%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

Mileage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 37%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

92%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

81%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Interior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%

Ice braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P -27%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands