12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R14 - R22	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

89%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Dry performance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Mileage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

Fuel efficiency

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 79%

Price/value

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

78%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

Interior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Ice lateral guidance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

Ice braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands