Segment
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Kumho (63%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO was done in 2018, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (77%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ also have B wet ratings.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R0 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Still recommended
