Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium2. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Michelin ALPIN 6
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.35
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Exemplary3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 2 | |||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 3+ | 3 | |||
| Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 | 34.6 | 29.6 | |||||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo | 36.0 | 29.3 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 6 | 36.2 | 29.7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
