Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Alenza 001 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Kumho (56%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Alenza 001 and Kumho WinterCraft WP71, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 55% of Bridgestone Alenza 001 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 has C rating.
| # | Bridgestone Alenza 001
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
