Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Alenza 001 SUV vs. Nokian WR D4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Alenza 001 SUV and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Alenza 001 SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (97%) of the Nokian WR D4 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Bridgestone Alenza 001 SUV
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended
