Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV Upper-middle2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Upper-middle
Comparison: BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV vs. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich summer tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Cooper (35%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the G-Grip SUV and the Zeon 4XS Sport were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport has A rating.
| # | BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
| Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 69 dB2. BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV 69 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 0,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | ||
| BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV Rating: Good | 3,4 | 2,0 | 2,0 | 3,2 | 1,5 | ||
| Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Rating: Good | 2,5 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
