Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 Upper-middle2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich allround tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Kumho (55%). But when it comes to comparing BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 and Kumho Solus HA31, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho Solus HA31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the G-Grip All Season 2 and the Solus HA31 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 has C rating.
| # | BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
| Kumho Solus HA31
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 Upper-middle2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
1. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
1. BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 Highly recommended2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 | 44,6 | 54,1 | |||||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||