Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER vs. Nokian WR D4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER has C wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B rating.
| # | BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian WR D4 81%
Dry driving behavior
1. Nokian WR D4 72%
Dry performance
2. Nokian WR D4 76%
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow performance
1. Nokian WR D4 88%
Snow braking
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
Snow handling
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
Snow traction
1. Nokian WR D4 89%
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
1. Nokian WR D4 85%
Ice lateral guidance
2. Nokian WR D4 82%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Nokian WR D4 67%
Fuel efficiency
2. Nokian WR D4 86%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
Interior noise
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
