18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 /0%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R13 - R23	R13 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 533

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 4x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 11.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 21.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 16.75

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 2020

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Wet braking

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 84%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 72%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 83%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 80%

Wet handling

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 78%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Wet circle cornering

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 74%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet performance

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 84%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

74%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Dry braking

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 71%

Dry handling

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 87%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

94%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

81%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

70%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 68%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 84%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

Snow performance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 80%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 77%

Comfort

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 92%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Interior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 71%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 67%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72 dB

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75%

Rolling resistance

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 82%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Mileage

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 67%

Price/value

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 76%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Fuel efficiency

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 86%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 77%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75%

Ice braking

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 73%

Ice lateral guidance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 78%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 78%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands