• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Sava (58%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 81% compared to 58% of the Sava Eskimo HP2. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the Eskimo HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 59% of Sava Eskimo HP2 has C rating. We also know where G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made - Romania/Poland.

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (2)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
Winter
2021 205/55 R16 View
Autobild Autobild
Winter
2019 225/45 R17 View

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
62%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Wet Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Sava Eskimo HP2
61%
Wet Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Sava Eskimo HP2
60%
Wet Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Sava Eskimo HP2
59%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Sava Eskimo HP2
57%
Aquaplaning Cross
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
Sava Eskimo HP2
73%
Best in category: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ (93.6%)
Dry Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
68%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Dry Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Best: Vredestein Wintrac (88.0%)
Dry Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Best in category: Continental WinterContact TS 860 (91.0%)
Snow Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
79%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Snow Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
94%
Sava Eskimo HP2
89%
Snow Traction
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
Sava Eskimo HP2
82%
Snow Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
92%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Snow Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Best in category: Debica Frigo HP2 (93.3%)
Comfort & Noise
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
76%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Noise Exterior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
Sava Eskimo HP2
69%
Ride Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Best in category: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ (92.0%)
Economy
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
79%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Rolling Resistance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Best: Nokian WR Snowproof (94.0%)
Mileage
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Best: Michelin Alpin 6 (98.0%)
Best in category: Continental WinterContact TS 870 (89.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison