14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nexen (47%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 84% compared to 38% of the Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made - Romania/Poland.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /84%	Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 /38%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R15 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 90

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 21x

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 13x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 7.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 27.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.19

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 12.85

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 2023

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

Dry

(Overall rating)

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7

74

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Dry braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 70%

Dry handling

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 77%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

76%

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7

72

Aquaplaning - cross

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 62%

Wet braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 70%

Wet handling

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 71%

Wet circle cornering

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7

72

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 74%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 96%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 80%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 65%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 68%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

86%

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7

84

Exterior noise

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 92%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 75%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7

71

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Rolling resistance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 63%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 62%

Price/value

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7

?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,2	29,3
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7	37,9	31,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7	36,3	26,4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2-	2	1-	2
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Rating: Good	2-	2	2	3+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	1
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Rating: Good	2-	2	2	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7	34	28,3
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands