12 shops, 56 847 products

|

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Michelin Alpin 5

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than BFGoodrich (75%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Michelin Alpin 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the Alpin 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (88%) of the Michelin Alpin 5 also have B wet ratings. We also know where G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made - Romania/Poland.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Michelin Alpin 5 /0%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R15 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Michelin Alpin 5 91

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Michelin Alpin 5 17x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Michelin Alpin 5 2.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Michelin Alpin 5 17.

Average position in tests

1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Michelin Alpin 5 2018

Best rating in test

1. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Alpin 5

79.2%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Michelin Alpin 5 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Alpin 5

84.3%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Michelin
Alpin 5

72.1%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

Michelin
Alpin 5

65.6%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Michelin Alpin 5 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Alpin 5

79.4%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Michelin Alpin 5 E

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Michelin
Alpin 5

79.3%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Michelin Alpin 5	33,3	28,7
Show test details