18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Matador MP93 Nordicca /40%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ /87%	Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 /81%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R13 - R20	R0 - R21	R14 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 92

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 78

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 14x

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca 4x

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 2.

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 11.

Worst position in test

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 14.

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 38.

Average position in tests

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 5.5

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 2025

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 2025

Best rating in test

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Good

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory

Dry

(Overall rating)

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

83.5%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

77.8%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

56%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

83.7%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

79.2%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

38.7%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 B

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca C

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

81.3%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

80.6%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

48.7%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

77.2%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 ?

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

73.5%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

70.9%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 C

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca D

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

30%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

0%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%