Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,2 | 29,3 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 38,6 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
