Segment
2. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium3. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Premium4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 vs. Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Exemplary2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Highly recommended3. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Recommended3. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended4. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 1 | 2 | |||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 1- | 2 | 3+ | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,1 | 25,9 | |||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 | 33,4 | 27,7 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 33,3 | 28,7 | |||||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | 32,2 | 29,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
