12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 vs. Michelin Alpin 5

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 /0%	Michelin Alpin 5 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R15 - R22	R15 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Premium

2. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 100

2. Michelin Alpin 5 91

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Michelin Alpin 5 17x

3. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 15x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 1.

3. Michelin Alpin 5 2.

Worst position in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 5.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Michelin Alpin 5 17.

Average position in tests

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 2.67

2. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 2018

3. Michelin Alpin 5 2018

Best rating in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Highly recommended

2. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Recommended

3. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Alpin 5

84.3%

Goodyear
UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

81.3%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

80.9%

Michelin
Alpin 5

79.2%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 B

2. Michelin Alpin 5 B

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Goodyear
UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

90.2%

Michelin
Alpin 5

72.1%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

Goodyear
UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

74.3%

Michelin
Alpin 5

65.6%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 70 dB

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Michelin Alpin 5 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

83.4%

Michelin
Alpin 5

79.4%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 C

2. Michelin Alpin 5 E

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

85%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Michelin
Alpin 5

79.3%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Rating: Good	2+	2	2+	3+
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1	33,4	27,7
Michelin Alpin 5	33,3	28,7
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 vs. Michelin Alpin 5

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands