18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /0%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R13 - R21	R13 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 359

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Dry

(Overall rating)

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

69%

Dry braking

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 76%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 71%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

Dry handling

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 79%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 71%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

Dry lane changing

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 50%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 0%

Dry steering response

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 58%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

70%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

70%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 71%

Wet braking

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 75%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 55%

Wet handling

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 67%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 84%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 71%

Wet circle cornering

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 65%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 62%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 61%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

95%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

74%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

57%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 64%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 55%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 95%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 95%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 42%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 74%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 51%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

83%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

77%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

66%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 60%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 78%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 71%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

66%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

65%

Rolling resistance

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 73%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 51%

Mileage

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 79%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 76%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Price/value

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 58%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

78%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75.2%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 10 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Falken EuroWinter HS01	36,3	25,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2-	2	1-	2
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	1
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	3+	3+	2
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	3+	2	2+
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,9	2,0	2,6	2,0
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,6	2,2	1,9	2,5	3,3	2,0
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,3	2,4	2,4	2,9	3,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Falken EuroWinter HS01	36,2	29,5
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	28,6
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2021 195/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	8,7	9,6	9,3	10	10	10
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	7,8	6,6	7,4	10	5	9
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	7,1	7,4	7,0	7,5	4	10
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	200	67	48	60	18	9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Recommended	194	63	42	60	14	9
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Conditionally recommended	167	63	45	39	10	5
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,5	8,7	9,9	10	9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Very good	7,0	7,3	9,9	10	8
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	7,1	6,9	6,7	5	8
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands