12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than BFGoodrich (75%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P has a better rating of 93% compared to 81% of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2021 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the WinterContact TS 870 P were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and WinterContact TS 870 P is made in Czech Republic.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

87%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 89%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 68%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 63%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 58%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

82%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 85%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 84%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

75%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

64%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 60%

Price/value

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 62%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 43%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1–	1
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 Rating: Good	3	2–	1	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good	2+	2	2+	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Snow
Best values in test	32.6	27.1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	36.0	27.3
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	35.6	28.0
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4	2.7
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good	2.5	2.3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1-	2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2+	2-
Show test details