• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than BFGoodrich (75%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 860 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 195/65 R15 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the WinterContact TS 860 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (99%) of the Continental WinterContact TS 860 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and WinterContact TS 860 is made in Portugal/Slovakia.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Wet Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Wet Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
94%
Wet Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
96%
Aquaplaning Cross
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
85%
Best in category: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ (93.6%)
Dry Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
77%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Dry Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
Dry Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
95%
Snow Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
92%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Snow Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Snow Traction
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
83%
Snow Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
Snow Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
97%
Best in category: Debica Frigo HP2 (93.3%)
Ice Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 860
76%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Ice Braking Abs
Continental WinterContact TS 860
76%
Ice Lateral Guidance
Continental WinterContact TS 860
76%
Best: Nokian WR Snowproof (91.0%)
Best in category: Michelin Alpin 6 (87.0%)
Comfort & Noise
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Noise Exterior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
84%
Noise Interior
Continental WinterContact TS 860
76%
Best: Vredestein Wintrac (80.0%)
Ride Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Best in category: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ (92.0%)
Economy
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Rolling Resistance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Best: Nokian WR Snowproof (97.0%)
Mileage
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
Best: Michelin Alpin 6 (100.0%)
Best in category: Michelin Alpin 6 (90.5%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison