• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than BFGoodrich (75%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (72%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland.

# BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
/81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
/0%

Add to comparison

BFGoodrich
Bridgestone
DimensionsR14 - R19 R14 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

2

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+12+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Rating: Good
22-1 2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Rating: Good
1-2-22+
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,225,9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 235,125,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00132,528,7
Show test details