Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Upper-middle2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV and the WR D4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (97%) of the Nokian WR D4 also have B wet ratings.
| # | BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Upper-middle2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
2. Nokian WR D4 14.
2. Nokian WR D4 6.04
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,5 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||