Segment
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Dunlop winter tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than BFGoodrich (75%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV and the Winter Sport 5 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (59%) of the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 also have B wet ratings.
| # | BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 1,7 |
| Show test details | |||||||
