Segment
1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Premium2. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than BFGoodrich (75%). But when it comes to comparing BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER and Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the ACTIVAN WINTER and the Cargo UltraGrip 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER has B wet grip rating, whereas 60% of Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 has C rating.
# | BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
| Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Premium2. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle
1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Still recommended
1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Rating: Not recommended | 4,9 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,7 |
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2,8 | 3,9 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
Show test details |