Segment
1. BF Goodrich g-Grip Upper-middle2. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost
Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Gt Radial Fe2
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BF) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Gt). Generally, BF summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Gt (37%). But when it comes to comparing BF Goodrich g-Grip and Gt Radial Fe2 , the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of BF Goodrich g-Grip was done in 2016, compared to 2023 when was the Gt Radial Fe2 first tested.
| # | BF Goodrich g-Grip
| Gt Radial Fe2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R15 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Gt Radial Fe2 11.
Worst position in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 22.
Average position in tests
1. Gt Radial Fe2 16.52. BF Goodrich g-Grip 19.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 Good2. BF Goodrich g-Grip Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 Good2. BF Goodrich g-Grip Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Gt Radial Fe2 75%
Wet circle cornering
2. Gt Radial Fe2 79%
Wet handling
2. Gt Radial Fe2 80%
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Gt Radial Fe2 72%
Rolling resistance
1. Gt Radial Fe2 65%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
2. Gt Radial Fe2 71%
