Segment
1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium2. BF Goodrich g-Grip Upper-middle3. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Upper-middle
Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 vs. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. BF Goodrich g-Grip 19.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Highly recommended2. BF Goodrich g-Grip Satisfactory3. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. BF Goodrich g-Grip Satisfactory2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Still recommended3. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| BF Goodrich g-Grip | 36,5 | 36 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 35,4 | 31,4 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | 35,2 | 32,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| BF Goodrich g-Grip | 36,2 | 41,8 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 34,4 | 38,3 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | 34,9 | 40,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
