Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. BF Goodrich g-Grip Upper-middle3. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Upper-middle4. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 13.334. BF Goodrich g-Grip 19.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory3. BF Goodrich g-Grip Satisfactory4. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. BF Goodrich g-Grip Satisfactory3. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended4. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| BF Goodrich g-Grip | 36,5 | 36 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 35,8 | 29,9 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | 35,2 | 32,9 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| BF Goodrich g-Grip | 36,2 | 41,8 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 34,9 | 35 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | 34,9 | 40,2 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,3 | 38,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
