Segment
1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Premium2. BF Goodrich g-force Winter Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BF) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, BF winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Vredestein (59%). But when it comes to comparing BF Goodrich g-force Winter and Vredestein Snowtrac 5, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Goodrich g-force Winter and the Snowtrac 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | BF Goodrich g-force Winter
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R13 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Premium2. BF Goodrich g-force Winter Upper-middle
1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 12.58
1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Satisfactory
1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Still recommended
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| BF Goodrich g-force Winter Rating: - | 3 | 2- | 2 | 1- | |||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: - | 3+ | 2 | 2- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| BF Goodrich g-force Winter | 39,4 | 26,8 | |||||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 | 38,9 | 27,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| BF Goodrich g-force Winter | 42,9 | 28,8 | |||||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 | 44,8 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||